Imported menthol-scented sweet supari classification dispute: seizure quashed, release for home consumption subject to duty bond; bank guarantee refus...
CKD/SKD air-conditioner components classifiable with finished units by essential character; prior advance ruling extended three years, FTA benefits po...
Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
High Court considered condonation of delay where an adjudication order was allegedly served only by uploading on the GST portal; limitation does not commence if service was not properly effected. The HC observed the grounds for condonation were not previously presented to the Appellate Authority but granted the petitioner an opportunity to reapply within three weeks with supporting explanations and documents. The Appellate Authority must reconsider the condonation application in light of the Division Bench precedent in M/s Ram Kumar Sinhal and related judgments; if satisfied the delay is excusable or service was ineffective, it shall hear the appeal and the impugned appellate order will be set aside.
High Court considered condonation of delay where an adjudication order was allegedly served only by uploading on the GST portal; limitation does not commence if service was not properly effected. The HC observed the grounds for condonation were not previously presented to the Appellate Authority but granted the petitioner an opportunity to reapply within three weeks with supporting explanations and documents. The Appellate Authority must reconsider the condonation application in light of the Division Bench precedent in M/s Ram Kumar Sinhal and related judgments; if satisfied the delay is excusable or service was ineffective, it shall hear the appeal and the impugned appellate order will be set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
