Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Insurer's investment gains and investment write-downs face Section 263 revision; enquiry upheld, Rule 5(b)(ii) lapse sustained, late corrigendum quash...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7241 to 7260 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
When a registered charitable trust disclosed receipts under "income from other sources," denial of exemption was unwarranted because assessing authorities must apply a judicious approach and grant exemptions or deductions to which the assessee is entitled; appellate authorities are empowered and obligated to correct AO errors and may entertain reliefs not claimed in the return, with supporting precedents and administrative guidance cited. The failure of the AO, CIT(A) and Tribunal to consider merits resulted in reversal of the adverse outcome and payment of costs against the revenue, restoring the trust's entitlement to the claimed exemption.
When a registered charitable trust disclosed receipts under "income from other sources," denial of exemption was unwarranted because assessing authorities must apply a judicious approach and grant exemptions or deductions to which the assessee is entitled; appellate authorities are empowered and obligated to correct AO errors and may entertain reliefs not claimed in the return, with supporting precedents and administrative guidance cited. The failure of the AO, CIT(A) and Tribunal to consider merits resulted in reversal of the adverse outcome and payment of costs against the revenue, restoring the trust's entitlement to the claimed exemption.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.