Validity of faceless assessment procedure challenged for jurisdictional AO intervention mid-remand, resulting in quashing of assessment for procedural...
Inventory write-off and fraudulent/wrongful trading allegations in corporate insolvency led to director liability principles applied and appeal dismis...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6741 to 6760 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Tribunal misapplied procedural law by referring to an incorrect provision and failed to consider the petitioner's supporting affidavit; consequently the High Court quashed the Miscellaneous Application order and recalled the Tribunal's earlier order. The Tribunal's adverse finding that the petitioner offered a "cooked story" was held to be baseless and contrary to record; accordingly the delay in filing cross objections is condoned on the affidavit averments and the cross objections are directed to be heard. Because the appeal and cross objections have been pending long, the Tribunal is ordered to decide both together within 12 weeks.
Tribunal misapplied procedural law by referring to an incorrect provision and failed to consider the petitioner's supporting affidavit; consequently the High Court quashed the Miscellaneous Application order and recalled the Tribunal's earlier order. The Tribunal's adverse finding that the petitioner offered a "cooked story" was held to be baseless and contrary to record; accordingly the delay in filing cross objections is condoned on the affidavit averments and the cross objections are directed to be heard. Because the appeal and cross objections have been pending long, the Tribunal is ordered to decide both together within 12 weeks.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4813 
Join Channel 
