Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Composite supply of drilling services and site specific chemicals characterised as composite supply; prior advance rulings set aside, tax rate left op...
Cross country pipeline classification and ITC entitlement: pipelines outside factory treated as immovable, ITC disallowed under Section 17 restriction...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6181 to 6200 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Addition for alleged non genuine accommodation entries was treated as unexplained money and deleted on appeal after the appellate forum found the assessing officer's reliance on statements and investigative inputs unsustainable; the deletion was accepted by NFAC. Reopening of assessment was held invalid because the reasons relied solely on the Investigation Wing report without independent application of mind by the AO (borrowed satisfaction), so reassessment proceedings were quashed. Reopening beyond the four year period also failed because the assessee had fully and truly disclosed material facts at original assessment, negating the proviso trigger for reassessment.
Addition for alleged non genuine accommodation entries was treated as unexplained money and deleted on appeal after the appellate forum found the assessing officer's reliance on statements and investigative inputs unsustainable; the deletion was accepted by NFAC. Reopening of assessment was held invalid because the reasons relied solely on the Investigation Wing report without independent application of mind by the AO (borrowed satisfaction), so reassessment proceedings were quashed. Reopening beyond the four year period also failed because the assessee had fully and truly disclosed material facts at original assessment, negating the proviso trigger for reassessment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.