Validity of faceless assessment procedure challenged for jurisdictional AO intervention mid-remand, resulting in quashing of assessment for procedural...
Inventory write-off and fraudulent/wrongful trading allegations in corporate insolvency led to director liability principles applied and appeal dismis...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6741 to 6760 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Revision under section 263 was upheld because the assessing officer failed to verify the assessee's suo motu disallowance of expenditure relating to exempt income and did not test the prescribed computation method or examine a third party report; outcome: revision sustained and relief denied. The tribunal accepted that the AO overlooked available intelligence indicating receipt of accommodation entries, attracting deeming provisions and negating the assessee's claim; outcome: section 263 action valid. The decision relied on precedent on strategic investment exclusion and the duty of the AO to make inquiries, and confirmed the revisional order against the assessee.
Revision under section 263 was upheld because the assessing officer failed to verify the assessee's suo motu disallowance of expenditure relating to exempt income and did not test the prescribed computation method or examine a third party report; outcome: revision sustained and relief denied. The tribunal accepted that the AO overlooked available intelligence indicating receipt of accommodation entries, attracting deeming provisions and negating the assessee's claim; outcome: section 263 action valid. The decision relied on precedent on strategic investment exclusion and the duty of the AO to make inquiries, and confirmed the revisional order against the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4813 
Join Channel 
