Proportionate interest, unexplained credits and partner remuneration disputed; proofs of fund nexus and lender identity were decisive and disallowance...
Capital gains valuation from stamp assessment versus net consideration for residential reinvestment: deemed stamp value replaced for gains but not for...
The definition of proceeds of crime is broad enough to cover property equivalent in value to assets derived from scheduled offences, permitting attachment where original proceeds are unavailable. When an appeal under the Appellate Tribunal is pending against an order under Section 8(3) PMLA, the Special Court should not decide an application under Section 8(7) PMLA; a deemed embargo and the doctrine of merger require deferral, and the Special Court's allowance of such an application was set aside. The appellant's Section 8(8) remedy was correctly dismissed for failure to show quantifiable loss. The confiscation vesting in the Central Government is absolute, and the appeal before the Appellate Tribunal was restored for merits.
The definition of proceeds of crime is broad enough to cover property equivalent in value to assets derived from scheduled offences, permitting attachment where original proceeds are unavailable. When an appeal under the Appellate Tribunal is pending against an order under Section 8(3) PMLA, the Special Court should not decide an application under Section 8(7) PMLA; a deemed embargo and the doctrine of merger require deferral, and the Special Court's allowance of such an application was set aside. The appellant's Section 8(8) remedy was correctly dismissed for failure to show quantifiable loss. The confiscation vesting in the Central Government is absolute, and the appeal before the Appellate Tribunal was restored for merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.