Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Composite supply of drilling services and site specific chemicals characterised as composite supply; prior advance rulings set aside, tax rate left op...
Cross country pipeline classification and ITC entitlement: pipelines outside factory treated as immovable, ITC disallowed under Section 17 restriction...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6181 to 6200 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The definition of proceeds of crime is broad enough to cover property equivalent in value to assets derived from scheduled offences, permitting attachment where original proceeds are unavailable. When an appeal under the Appellate Tribunal is pending against an order under Section 8(3) PMLA, the Special Court should not decide an application under Section 8(7) PMLA; a deemed embargo and the doctrine of merger require deferral, and the Special Court's allowance of such an application was set aside. The appellant's Section 8(8) remedy was correctly dismissed for failure to show quantifiable loss. The confiscation vesting in the Central Government is absolute, and the appeal before the Appellate Tribunal was restored for merits.
The definition of proceeds of crime is broad enough to cover property equivalent in value to assets derived from scheduled offences, permitting attachment where original proceeds are unavailable. When an appeal under the Appellate Tribunal is pending against an order under Section 8(3) PMLA, the Special Court should not decide an application under Section 8(7) PMLA; a deemed embargo and the doctrine of merger require deferral, and the Special Court's allowance of such an application was set aside. The appellant's Section 8(8) remedy was correctly dismissed for failure to show quantifiable loss. The confiscation vesting in the Central Government is absolute, and the appeal before the Appellate Tribunal was restored for merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
