Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Insurer's investment gains and investment write-downs face Section 263 revision; enquiry upheld, Rule 5(b)(ii) lapse sustained, late corrigendum quash...
Application for rectification is confined to errors apparent on the record; re appreciation of evidence or revisiting factual findings is impermissible, and the rectification plea was dismissed. Penalty assessment principle confirmed: penalty must not exceed the demand upheld on remand, and Section 78 liability is to be re determined equal to the confirmed demand. Contract interpretation finding that the work order price expressly included service tax is a factual conclusion supported by contract terms and is not a patent error subject to rectification; that ground was rejected.
Application for rectification is confined to errors apparent on the record; re appreciation of evidence or revisiting factual findings is impermissible, and the rectification plea was dismissed. Penalty assessment principle confirmed: penalty must not exceed the demand upheld on remand, and Section 78 liability is to be re determined equal to the confirmed demand. Contract interpretation finding that the work order price expressly included service tax is a factual conclusion supported by contract terms and is not a patent error subject to rectification; that ground was rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
