Expenses for overseas film shooting treated as services availed outside India, so no reverse charge service tax liability; cenvat reversals and penalt...
Electricity consumptionbased clandestine production estimates under the repealed Central Excise Act found insufficient; demand quashed and appeals all...
Application for rectification is confined to errors apparent on the record; re appreciation of evidence or revisiting factual findings is impermissible, and the rectification plea was dismissed. Penalty assessment principle confirmed: penalty must not exceed the demand upheld on remand, and Section 78 liability is to be re determined equal to the confirmed demand. Contract interpretation finding that the work order price expressly included service tax is a factual conclusion supported by contract terms and is not a patent error subject to rectification; that ground was rejected.
Application for rectification is confined to errors apparent on the record; re appreciation of evidence or revisiting factual findings is impermissible, and the rectification plea was dismissed. Penalty assessment principle confirmed: penalty must not exceed the demand upheld on remand, and Section 78 liability is to be re determined equal to the confirmed demand. Contract interpretation finding that the work order price expressly included service tax is a factual conclusion supported by contract terms and is not a patent error subject to rectification; that ground was rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
