Unlawful outward remittances via Hawala using proforma invoices and electronic records proved; documents admitted, directors penalised, penalties redu...
Attachment of equivalent-value properties as proceeds of crime upheld; preventive attachment order and confirmation sustained; no independent ED reinv...
Broker trading-system "technical glitch" redefinition and narrowed incident-reporting regime for large IBT/STWT brokers requiring 2-hr notice and 14-w...
A High Court addressed a suit for specific performance and damages, considering whether Section 31 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act barred the suit and whether prior findings created res judicata. The court confined its adverse decision on an additional issue framed on January 4, 2023 to that narrow issue, holding that this determination will not prejudice the parties on the four original issues framed on December 14, 1992. Questions on legality, validity, sufficiency and enforceability of the January 2, 1989 agreement, including its effect under the Income Tax Act and other FERA aspects, remain open for full adjudication at trial.
A High Court addressed a suit for specific performance and damages, considering whether Section 31 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act barred the suit and whether prior findings created res judicata. The court confined its adverse decision on an additional issue framed on January 4, 2023 to that narrow issue, holding that this determination will not prejudice the parties on the four original issues framed on December 14, 1992. Questions on legality, validity, sufficiency and enforceability of the January 2, 1989 agreement, including its effect under the Income Tax Act and other FERA aspects, remain open for full adjudication at trial.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
