Proportionate interest, unexplained credits and partner remuneration disputed; proofs of fund nexus and lender identity were decisive and disallowance...
Capital gains valuation from stamp assessment versus net consideration for residential reinvestment: deemed stamp value replaced for gains but not for...
Abeyance of limitation applies where a rectification application under the GST statute was pending; the time spent pursuing rectification is excluded and the appeal is maintainable despite delay, the Court applying the principle of bona fide pursuit before a wrong forum and directing the appellate authority to decide on merits. Because the petitioner deposited 10% in the leading matter and 25% in the connected matter, the appeals are to be treated as not barred by delay, and the appellate authority must decide them on merits within two months. Writ petitions disposed accordingly.
Abeyance of limitation applies where a rectification application under the GST statute was pending; the time spent pursuing rectification is excluded and the appeal is maintainable despite delay, the Court applying the principle of bona fide pursuit before a wrong forum and directing the appellate authority to decide on merits. Because the petitioner deposited 10% in the leading matter and 25% in the connected matter, the appeals are to be treated as not barred by delay, and the appellate authority must decide them on merits within two months. Writ petitions disposed accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
