Assessment time-barred u/s 153 due to missing competent-authority reference for Singapore exchange of information; assessment disallowed as barred by ...
Imported menthol-scented sweet supari classification dispute: seizure quashed, release for home consumption subject to duty bond; bank guarantee refus...
CKD/SKD air-conditioner components classifiable with finished units by essential character; prior advance ruling extended three years, FTA benefits po...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7221 to 7240 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Declaration that a taxpayer's return is invalid constitutes an...
Revisability of return invalidation communications under tax procedure affirmed, impugned non revisional finding quashed and matter remitted for fresh consideration.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Declaration that a taxpayer's return is invalid constitutes an actionable directive and is revisable under the tax revision provision; treating a communication of invalidity as not being an "order" was held legally incorrect. The decision reasons that a declaration under the return-validation provision qualifies as a mandate or authoritative direction and therefore falls within revision jurisdiction. The impugned ruling rejecting revisability was quashed and the revision application was restored for de novo consideration, directing fresh adjudication on merits under the revision mechanism.
Declaration that a taxpayer's return is invalid constitutes an actionable directive and is revisable under the tax revision provision; treating a communication of invalidity as not being an "order" was held legally incorrect. The decision reasons that a declaration under the return-validation provision qualifies as a mandate or authoritative direction and therefore falls within revision jurisdiction. The impugned ruling rejecting revisability was quashed and the revision application was restored for de novo consideration, directing fresh adjudication on merits under the revision mechanism.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.