International transaction characterisation of domestic divestment of support services business rejected; transaction between resident associated enter...
Minimum Import Price restrictions for Black Pepper, Areca-nuts and Apples upheld; procedural laying failure not fatal, notifications to be placed befo...
Transaction value between related persons requires market-equivalent pricing; importer must prove declared value mirrors ordinary international trade ...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6841 to 6860 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Declaration that a taxpayer's return is invalid constitutes an...
Revisability of return invalidation communications under tax procedure affirmed, impugned non revisional finding quashed and matter remitted for fresh consideration.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Declaration that a taxpayer's return is invalid constitutes an actionable directive and is revisable under the tax revision provision; treating a communication of invalidity as not being an "order" was held legally incorrect. The decision reasons that a declaration under the return-validation provision qualifies as a mandate or authoritative direction and therefore falls within revision jurisdiction. The impugned ruling rejecting revisability was quashed and the revision application was restored for de novo consideration, directing fresh adjudication on merits under the revision mechanism.
Declaration that a taxpayer's return is invalid constitutes an actionable directive and is revisable under the tax revision provision; treating a communication of invalidity as not being an "order" was held legally incorrect. The decision reasons that a declaration under the return-validation provision qualifies as a mandate or authoritative direction and therefore falls within revision jurisdiction. The impugned ruling rejecting revisability was quashed and the revision application was restored for de novo consideration, directing fresh adjudication on merits under the revision mechanism.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.