Search and seizure: abatement of earlier search bars use of prior seized material in later search-based assessments; relief limited to new documents f...
Admission of additional evidence under remand rules must await a meaningful remand report; failure to do so breaches natural justice and mandates rema...
Export Obligation Discharge Certificates for EPCG compliance cannot be questioned by Customs unless DGFT adjudicates and cancels them, so demands quas...
Page of 4811
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6561 to 6580 of 96208 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Declaration that a taxpayer's return is invalid constitutes an...
Revisability of return invalidation communications under tax procedure affirmed, impugned non revisional finding quashed and matter remitted for fresh consideration.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Declaration that a taxpayer's return is invalid constitutes an actionable directive and is revisable under the tax revision provision; treating a communication of invalidity as not being an "order" was held legally incorrect. The decision reasons that a declaration under the return-validation provision qualifies as a mandate or authoritative direction and therefore falls within revision jurisdiction. The impugned ruling rejecting revisability was quashed and the revision application was restored for de novo consideration, directing fresh adjudication on merits under the revision mechanism.
Declaration that a taxpayer's return is invalid constitutes an actionable directive and is revisable under the tax revision provision; treating a communication of invalidity as not being an "order" was held legally incorrect. The decision reasons that a declaration under the return-validation provision qualifies as a mandate or authoritative direction and therefore falls within revision jurisdiction. The impugned ruling rejecting revisability was quashed and the revision application was restored for de novo consideration, directing fresh adjudication on merits under the revision mechanism.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.