Proportionate interest, unexplained credits and partner remuneration disputed; proofs of fund nexus and lender identity were decisive and disallowance...
Capital gains valuation from stamp assessment versus net consideration for residential reinvestment: deemed stamp value replaced for gains but not for...
Addition claimed as cessation of liability for alleged non existent sundry creditors was examined where the AO had accepted increased purchases, sales and consequent creditor balances and prior years' assessments similarly accepted such creditors. The tribunal found sample based non verification of 29.24% of creditors insufficient to displace accepted trading results, and relied on higher court precedents to hold that no addition under cessation of liability principles was warranted. The AO's addition was deleted and the tax effect reversed in favour of the assessee.
Addition claimed as cessation of liability for alleged non existent sundry creditors was examined where the AO had accepted increased purchases, sales and consequent creditor balances and prior years' assessments similarly accepted such creditors. The tribunal found sample based non verification of 29.24% of creditors insufficient to displace accepted trading results, and relied on higher court precedents to hold that no addition under cessation of liability principles was warranted. The AO's addition was deleted and the tax effect reversed in favour of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.