Validity of faceless assessment procedure challenged for jurisdictional AO intervention mid-remand, resulting in quashing of assessment for procedural...
Inventory write-off and fraudulent/wrongful trading allegations in corporate insolvency led to director liability principles applied and appeal dismis...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6741 to 6760 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Exemption under section 10(23FBA) read with section 115UB was permitted where a scheme floated under a SEBI registered Category II AIF trust held a separate PAN; the existence of SEBI registration in the trust's PAN alone does not defeat scheme level exemption, so the addition under section 10(23FBA) was deleted. Separately, the difference between book surplus and amounts distributed to investors was held to reflect statutory indexation on long term capital gains from unlisted equity and not independent business income; accordingly the Assessing Officer's taxation of that difference as business income was deleted and the ground allowing indexation was accepted.
Exemption under section 10(23FBA) read with section 115UB was permitted where a scheme floated under a SEBI registered Category II AIF trust held a separate PAN; the existence of SEBI registration in the trust's PAN alone does not defeat scheme level exemption, so the addition under section 10(23FBA) was deleted. Separately, the difference between book surplus and amounts distributed to investors was held to reflect statutory indexation on long term capital gains from unlisted equity and not independent business income; accordingly the Assessing Officer's taxation of that difference as business income was deleted and the ground allowing indexation was accepted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.