Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Insurer's investment gains and investment write-downs face Section 263 revision; enquiry upheld, Rule 5(b)(ii) lapse sustained, late corrigendum quash...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7241 to 7260 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Adoption of CERC tariff for internal bagasse transfer was rejected because treating bagasse as a by product with captive consumption, cost analysis using FRP and third party quotations produced a more realistic arm's length price; the Tribunal directed acceptance of the assessee's Rs.1,500/ton transfer price. The write off of loans/advances to a wholly owned subsidiary was held to be a business loss incurred for commercial expediency and allowable under the law as a deduction under business loss provisions. Harvesting and transport payments were found not to attract withholding under contract withholding rules, so no disallowance under withholding non compliance was warranted. Dispute on interest deduction timing requires AO verification under payment timing rules.
Adoption of CERC tariff for internal bagasse transfer was rejected because treating bagasse as a by product with captive consumption, cost analysis using FRP and third party quotations produced a more realistic arm's length price; the Tribunal directed acceptance of the assessee's Rs.1,500/ton transfer price. The write off of loans/advances to a wholly owned subsidiary was held to be a business loss incurred for commercial expediency and allowable under the law as a deduction under business loss provisions. Harvesting and transport payments were found not to attract withholding under contract withholding rules, so no disallowance under withholding non compliance was warranted. Dispute on interest deduction timing requires AO verification under payment timing rules.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.