Attachment and proclamation of sale of immovable property: limitation treated from financial year end; proclamation held within period, petition dismi...
Second Schedule attachment and validity of a post-notice mortgage: TRO cannot declare mortgage void ab initio; sale and appropriation allowed thereaft...
Limitation for final assessment under sections 144C and 153 treated jointly, resulting in quashing of timebarred assessment order and liberty to reviv...
Deductibility of settlement payments for securities law penalties and treatment of unexplained cash credits in share trading -- Tribunal upholds posit...
Threshold for allottee-initiated insolvency petitions in leasehold real estate upheld; petition admitted after possession letters deemed legally ineff...
Contravention of foreign exchange rules in crossborder diamond payments; appellate tribunal reduces one appellant's penalty for delay and proportional...
Adoption of CERC tariff for internal bagasse transfer was rejected because treating bagasse as a by product with captive consumption, cost analysis using FRP and third party quotations produced a more realistic arm's length price; the Tribunal directed acceptance of the assessee's Rs.1,500/ton transfer price. The write off of loans/advances to a wholly owned subsidiary was held to be a business loss incurred for commercial expediency and allowable under the law as a deduction under business loss provisions. Harvesting and transport payments were found not to attract withholding under contract withholding rules, so no disallowance under withholding non compliance was warranted. Dispute on interest deduction timing requires AO verification under payment timing rules.
Adoption of CERC tariff for internal bagasse transfer was rejected because treating bagasse as a by product with captive consumption, cost analysis using FRP and third party quotations produced a more realistic arm's length price; the Tribunal directed acceptance of the assessee's Rs.1,500/ton transfer price. The write off of loans/advances to a wholly owned subsidiary was held to be a business loss incurred for commercial expediency and allowable under the law as a deduction under business loss provisions. Harvesting and transport payments were found not to attract withholding under contract withholding rules, so no disallowance under withholding non compliance was warranted. Dispute on interest deduction timing requires AO verification under payment timing rules.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
