Attachment and proclamation of sale of immovable property: limitation treated from financial year end; proclamation held within period, petition dismi...
Second Schedule attachment and validity of a post-notice mortgage: TRO cannot declare mortgage void ab initio; sale and appropriation allowed thereaft...
Limitation for final assessment under sections 144C and 153 treated jointly, resulting in quashing of timebarred assessment order and liberty to reviv...
Deductibility of settlement payments for securities law penalties and treatment of unexplained cash credits in share trading -- Tribunal upholds posit...
Threshold for allottee-initiated insolvency petitions in leasehold real estate upheld; petition admitted after possession letters deemed legally ineff...
Contravention of foreign exchange rules in crossborder diamond payments; appellate tribunal reduces one appellant's penalty for delay and proportional...
Customs valuation dispute over imported melamine considers whether declared transaction value was inflated to evade anti dumping duty. Tribunal emphasises the transaction value principle (GATT) and requires actual negotiated price evidence rather than reliance on a published price bulletin; consequence: confirmation of ADD based solely on market journal prices and untested electronic or recorded statements is unsustainable. Tribunal also notes electronic evidence and recorded statements require tendering with opportunity for cross examination before an adjudicating authority; absence of corroborative, cogent evidence undermines findings of deliberate overvaluation for ADD evasion.
Customs valuation dispute over imported melamine considers whether declared transaction value was inflated to evade anti dumping duty. Tribunal emphasises the transaction value principle (GATT) and requires actual negotiated price evidence rather than reliance on a published price bulletin; consequence: confirmation of ADD based solely on market journal prices and untested electronic or recorded statements is unsustainable. Tribunal also notes electronic evidence and recorded statements require tendering with opportunity for cross examination before an adjudicating authority; absence of corroborative, cogent evidence undermines findings of deliberate overvaluation for ADD evasion.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.