CENVAT credit availability after omission of Rule 12B in textiles confirmed; late addendum to SCN introducing new grounds held time-barred and invalid...
Export of Wheat Flour and related products subject to online allocation, eligibility criteria, non-transferable six-month authorisations and reporting...
Straight-line lease rental accounting change results in penalty quashed where disclosed accounts and bona fide arguable accounting interpretation exis...
Rectification of GST records was challenged on grounds that an application seeking correction and reconciliation of input tax credit (ITC) was rejected without affording an opportunity of hearing and without verifying uploaded portal records. The court found the rejection procedurally defective for not recording reasons for disregarding submitted reconciliation statements and supporting documents, and for failing to provide a personal hearing; therefore the rejection order was set aside. The matter is remanded for fresh disposal of the rectification application, with directions to consider portal evidence, allow the applicant to present documents and explanations, and hear the applicant within a specified short period.
Rectification of GST records was challenged on grounds that an application seeking correction and reconciliation of input tax credit (ITC) was rejected without affording an opportunity of hearing and without verifying uploaded portal records. The court found the rejection procedurally defective for not recording reasons for disregarding submitted reconciliation statements and supporting documents, and for failing to provide a personal hearing; therefore the rejection order was set aside. The matter is remanded for fresh disposal of the rectification application, with directions to consider portal evidence, allow the applicant to present documents and explanations, and hear the applicant within a specified short period.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
