Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Notional carry forward of depreciation losses that were previously set off against other income cannot be notionally brought forward to compute the deduction under section 80IA, because section 80IA(5) contains no mandate for such notional setoff; consequence: such earlier-absorbed losses are excluded when computing the 80IA deduction. Separately, section 80IA(9) prevents double claiming of deductions so that deductions under other Chapter VIA provisions remain computable but their combined allowability with 80IA is capped at 100% of business profits; CBDT guidance supports this limiting effect to prevent repeated deductions.
Notional carry forward of depreciation losses that were previously set off against other income cannot be notionally brought forward to compute the deduction under section 80IA, because section 80IA(5) contains no mandate for such notional setoff; consequence: such earlier-absorbed losses are excluded when computing the 80IA deduction. Separately, section 80IA(9) prevents double claiming of deductions so that deductions under other Chapter VIA provisions remain computable but their combined allowability with 80IA is capped at 100% of business profits; CBDT guidance supports this limiting effect to prevent repeated deductions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.