Retrospective application of beneficial circulars upheld, binding officers and granting post adjudication relief where adjudication occurred after cir...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Property received pursuant to a family settlement was held not to constitute a 'transfer' under the definition of transfer and therefore not taxable as deemed income under the provision addressing property received without consideration. The tribunal accepted that the gift deed merely formalised title vesting between members who constituted an HUF, facts which the AO did not contest and which the CIT(A) found established. Consequence: the gift was treated as the formal execution of a family settlement, exempting it from being treated as taxable deemed income.
Property received pursuant to a family settlement was held not to constitute a 'transfer' under the definition of transfer and therefore not taxable as deemed income under the provision addressing property received without consideration. The tribunal accepted that the gift deed merely formalised title vesting between members who constituted an HUF, facts which the AO did not contest and which the CIT(A) found established. Consequence: the gift was treated as the formal execution of a family settlement, exempting it from being treated as taxable deemed income.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.