Unlawful outward remittances via Hawala using proforma invoices and electronic records proved; documents admitted, directors penalised, penalties redu...
Attachment of equivalent-value properties as proceeds of crime upheld; preventive attachment order and confirmation sustained; no independent ED reinv...
Maintainability of a demand under Section 28 for imported recycled LDPE granules was challenged on procedural grounds: the adjudicating authority cited relied upon documents (RUDs) in the show cause notice but did not furnish them to the importer, undermining procedural fairness and the provisional assessment. The tribunal treated the failure to provide RUDs and inconsistent findings as decisive, set aside the demands, appropriation of deposits, penalties and confiscation, and granted consequential reliefs to the appellants, relying on tribunal precedent to invalidate the assessment measures.
Maintainability of a demand under Section 28 for imported recycled LDPE granules was challenged on procedural grounds: the adjudicating authority cited relied upon documents (RUDs) in the show cause notice but did not furnish them to the importer, undermining procedural fairness and the provisional assessment. The tribunal treated the failure to provide RUDs and inconsistent findings as decisive, set aside the demands, appropriation of deposits, penalties and confiscation, and granted consequential reliefs to the appellants, relying on tribunal precedent to invalidate the assessment measures.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
