Benami transaction and beneficial ownership: documentary and circumstantial evidence show payors were true beneficiaries, resulting in PBPTA consequen...
Denial of Preferential Treatment under SAFTA overturned where unchallenged Country of Origin certificate warranted exemption under Notification benefi...
Continuing offence of money-laundering: discharge set aside and proceedings reinstated where laundering continued after inclusion of predicate offence...
Maintainability of a demand under Section 28 for imported recycled LDPE granules was challenged on procedural grounds: the adjudicating authority cited relied upon documents (RUDs) in the show cause notice but did not furnish them to the importer, undermining procedural fairness and the provisional assessment. The tribunal treated the failure to provide RUDs and inconsistent findings as decisive, set aside the demands, appropriation of deposits, penalties and confiscation, and granted consequential reliefs to the appellants, relying on tribunal precedent to invalidate the assessment measures.
Maintainability of a demand under Section 28 for imported recycled LDPE granules was challenged on procedural grounds: the adjudicating authority cited relied upon documents (RUDs) in the show cause notice but did not furnish them to the importer, undermining procedural fairness and the provisional assessment. The tribunal treated the failure to provide RUDs and inconsistent findings as decisive, set aside the demands, appropriation of deposits, penalties and confiscation, and granted consequential reliefs to the appellants, relying on tribunal precedent to invalidate the assessment measures.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
