Retrospective application of beneficial circulars upheld, binding officers and granting post adjudication relief where adjudication occurred after cir...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
CBIC instructions prescribing a monetary threshold for instituting appeals were applied to bar lowvalue Revenue appeals. The Board, exercising powers under the Customs statute, fixed a Rs.50 lakh threshold and excluded categories not matching the present disputes; because the departmental demand reduced to Rs.20,85,698, the appeals fell below the prescribed limit and were held nonmaintainable under the Government's litigation policy. Consequentially, the Revenue's appeals were dismissed for noncompliance with the CBIC instruction prescribing the monetary limit, with no substantive adjudication on merits.
CBIC instructions prescribing a monetary threshold for instituting appeals were applied to bar lowvalue Revenue appeals. The Board, exercising powers under the Customs statute, fixed a Rs.50 lakh threshold and excluded categories not matching the present disputes; because the departmental demand reduced to Rs.20,85,698, the appeals fell below the prescribed limit and were held nonmaintainable under the Government's litigation policy. Consequentially, the Revenue's appeals were dismissed for noncompliance with the CBIC instruction prescribing the monetary limit, with no substantive adjudication on merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
