Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Share application money was treated as financial debt and the appellate tribunal applied res judicata to reject reopening issues already finally decided; consequence: the subsequent insolvency petition under Section 7 was properly admitted where the corporate debtor failed to refund amounts after prior proceedings. The tribunal found earlier assurances to refund were not genuine and, on merits, upheld admission of the petition and dismissed the appeal. Consequent orders directed refund of the interim deposit to the appellant, permitted the appellant to remit specified sums to the financial creditor, and allowed the resolution professional to continue CIRP excluding the specified interim period.
Share application money was treated as financial debt and the appellate tribunal applied res judicata to reject reopening issues already finally decided; consequence: the subsequent insolvency petition under Section 7 was properly admitted where the corporate debtor failed to refund amounts after prior proceedings. The tribunal found earlier assurances to refund were not genuine and, on merits, upheld admission of the petition and dismissed the appeal. Consequent orders directed refund of the interim deposit to the appellant, permitted the appellant to remit specified sums to the financial creditor, and allowed the resolution professional to continue CIRP excluding the specified interim period.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
