Proportionate interest, unexplained credits and partner remuneration disputed; proofs of fund nexus and lender identity were decisive and disallowance...
Capital gains valuation from stamp assessment versus net consideration for residential reinvestment: deemed stamp value replaced for gains but not for...
Share application money was treated as financial debt and the appellate tribunal applied res judicata to reject reopening issues already finally decided; consequence: the subsequent insolvency petition under Section 7 was properly admitted where the corporate debtor failed to refund amounts after prior proceedings. The tribunal found earlier assurances to refund were not genuine and, on merits, upheld admission of the petition and dismissed the appeal. Consequent orders directed refund of the interim deposit to the appellant, permitted the appellant to remit specified sums to the financial creditor, and allowed the resolution professional to continue CIRP excluding the specified interim period.
Share application money was treated as financial debt and the appellate tribunal applied res judicata to reject reopening issues already finally decided; consequence: the subsequent insolvency petition under Section 7 was properly admitted where the corporate debtor failed to refund amounts after prior proceedings. The tribunal found earlier assurances to refund were not genuine and, on merits, upheld admission of the petition and dismissed the appeal. Consequent orders directed refund of the interim deposit to the appellant, permitted the appellant to remit specified sums to the financial creditor, and allowed the resolution professional to continue CIRP excluding the specified interim period.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
