Attachment and proclamation of sale of immovable property: limitation treated from financial year end; proclamation held within period, petition dismi...
Second Schedule attachment and validity of a post-notice mortgage: TRO cannot declare mortgage void ab initio; sale and appropriation allowed thereaft...
Limitation for final assessment under sections 144C and 153 treated jointly, resulting in quashing of timebarred assessment order and liberty to reviv...
Deductibility of settlement payments for securities law penalties and treatment of unexplained cash credits in share trading -- Tribunal upholds posit...
Threshold for allottee-initiated insolvency petitions in leasehold real estate upheld; petition admitted after possession letters deemed legally ineff...
Contravention of foreign exchange rules in crossborder diamond payments; appellate tribunal reduces one appellant's penalty for delay and proportional...
Savings clause in the GST regime permits initiation and...
Electricity consumptionbased clandestine production estimates under the repealed Central Excise Act found insufficient; demand quashed and appeals allowed
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Savings clause in the GST regime permits initiation and continuation of proceedings under the repealed Central Excise Act; therefore proceedings instituted postappointed day remain valid. Estimation of clandestine production and removal solely from electricity consumption is legally insufficient without additional corroborative factors; consequently calculations based only on consumption cannot sustain a duty, interest or penalty demand. Reliance on precedents where courts rejected electricitybased production estimates supports quashing such demands. The impugned demand based exclusively on electricityconsumption metrics was set aside and the appeals allowed.
Savings clause in the GST regime permits initiation and continuation of proceedings under the repealed Central Excise Act; therefore proceedings instituted postappointed day remain valid. Estimation of clandestine production and removal solely from electricity consumption is legally insufficient without additional corroborative factors; consequently calculations based only on consumption cannot sustain a duty, interest or penalty demand. Reliance on precedents where courts rejected electricitybased production estimates supports quashing such demands. The impugned demand based exclusively on electricityconsumption metrics was set aside and the appeals allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.