Prohibited importation of cosmetics without prior regulatory registration attracts seizure and confiscation; warehousing or re export claims do not cu...
Provisional release on security permitted where cash deposit plus bond secures differential duty; classification and treaty benefits referred for deci...
Customs Valuation Rule Sequence must be followed; single-comparator re-determination and penalties set aside without comparability or proof of mis-dec...
Separately Identifiable Services: transportation found to be the essential character, so Cargo Handling classification and extended limitation rejecte...
Savings clause in the GST regime permits initiation and...
Electricity consumptionbased clandestine production estimates under the repealed Central Excise Act found insufficient; demand quashed and appeals allowed
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Savings clause in the GST regime permits initiation and continuation of proceedings under the repealed Central Excise Act; therefore proceedings instituted postappointed day remain valid. Estimation of clandestine production and removal solely from electricity consumption is legally insufficient without additional corroborative factors; consequently calculations based only on consumption cannot sustain a duty, interest or penalty demand. Reliance on precedents where courts rejected electricitybased production estimates supports quashing such demands. The impugned demand based exclusively on electricityconsumption metrics was set aside and the appeals allowed.
Savings clause in the GST regime permits initiation and continuation of proceedings under the repealed Central Excise Act; therefore proceedings instituted postappointed day remain valid. Estimation of clandestine production and removal solely from electricity consumption is legally insufficient without additional corroborative factors; consequently calculations based only on consumption cannot sustain a duty, interest or penalty demand. Reliance on precedents where courts rejected electricitybased production estimates supports quashing such demands. The impugned demand based exclusively on electricityconsumption metrics was set aside and the appeals allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
