Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Taxability of payments to an overseas joint venture for business support or IT software services depends on place of provision rules and whether the overseas entity is treated as a distinct person. The Tribunal reasoned that "operational and administrative assistance" has wide scope but classification remains governed by the service description provision; the expansion to include such comprehensive services took effect from 01.05.2011, so earlier receipts cannot be taxed under that head. Reimbursements or intercompany fund transfers are not consideration for taxable service and cannot be taxed as gross receipts. Applying precedent, the Tribunal held the challenged consultancy payments to the foreign JV were not liable to service tax and dismissed the appeal.
Taxability of payments to an overseas joint venture for business support or IT software services depends on place of provision rules and whether the overseas entity is treated as a distinct person. The Tribunal reasoned that "operational and administrative assistance" has wide scope but classification remains governed by the service description provision; the expansion to include such comprehensive services took effect from 01.05.2011, so earlier receipts cannot be taxed under that head. Reimbursements or intercompany fund transfers are not consideration for taxable service and cannot be taxed as gross receipts. Applying precedent, the Tribunal held the challenged consultancy payments to the foreign JV were not liable to service tax and dismissed the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.