Reopening Assessments invalid where satisfaction and jurisdictional approval are absent for third party seized material, leading to quashing of assess...
Benami property exclusion from the insolvency estate: Benami Act proceedings preclude IBC tribunals from reopening attachments or treating such assets...
Exclusion of limitation period: pandemic suspension plus debtor acknowledgement can extend limitation, requiring fresh factfinding on guarantee invoca...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5941 to 5960 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Taxability of payments to an overseas joint venture for business support or IT software services depends on place of provision rules and whether the overseas entity is treated as a distinct person. The Tribunal reasoned that "operational and administrative assistance" has wide scope but classification remains governed by the service description provision; the expansion to include such comprehensive services took effect from 01.05.2011, so earlier receipts cannot be taxed under that head. Reimbursements or intercompany fund transfers are not consideration for taxable service and cannot be taxed as gross receipts. Applying precedent, the Tribunal held the challenged consultancy payments to the foreign JV were not liable to service tax and dismissed the appeal.
Taxability of payments to an overseas joint venture for business support or IT software services depends on place of provision rules and whether the overseas entity is treated as a distinct person. The Tribunal reasoned that "operational and administrative assistance" has wide scope but classification remains governed by the service description provision; the expansion to include such comprehensive services took effect from 01.05.2011, so earlier receipts cannot be taxed under that head. Reimbursements or intercompany fund transfers are not consideration for taxable service and cannot be taxed as gross receipts. Applying precedent, the Tribunal held the challenged consultancy payments to the foreign JV were not liable to service tax and dismissed the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.