Educational approval requires mandatory State registration, but incidental surplus and trustee-owned land do not prove private benefit or profit motiv...
Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
441 to 460 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Taxability of payments to an overseas joint venture for business support or IT software services depends on place of provision rules and whether the overseas entity is treated as a distinct person. The Tribunal reasoned that "operational and administrative assistance" has wide scope but classification remains governed by the service description provision; the expansion to include such comprehensive services took effect from 01.05.2011, so earlier receipts cannot be taxed under that head. Reimbursements or intercompany fund transfers are not consideration for taxable service and cannot be taxed as gross receipts. Applying precedent, the Tribunal held the challenged consultancy payments to the foreign JV were not liable to service tax and dismissed the appeal.
Taxability of payments to an overseas joint venture for business support or IT software services depends on place of provision rules and whether the overseas entity is treated as a distinct person. The Tribunal reasoned that "operational and administrative assistance" has wide scope but classification remains governed by the service description provision; the expansion to include such comprehensive services took effect from 01.05.2011, so earlier receipts cannot be taxed under that head. Reimbursements or intercompany fund transfers are not consideration for taxable service and cannot be taxed as gross receipts. Applying precedent, the Tribunal held the challenged consultancy payments to the foreign JV were not liable to service tax and dismissed the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
