Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Court exercised discretionary relief despite expiry of limitation under Section 107 by quashing and remitting the tax order for fresh adjudication on merits. The writ is disposed subject to the petitioner depositing 25% of the disputed tax as a pre-deposit condition for de novo proceedings; bank attachment is ordered to be vacated on compliance and provided no other arrears exist. Amounts already recovered or paid will be verified and set off against the 25% pre-deposit; if recovered amounts exceed 25% no further payment is required. Noncompliance permits respondents to resume recovery as if the writ were dismissed.
Court exercised discretionary relief despite expiry of limitation under Section 107 by quashing and remitting the tax order for fresh adjudication on merits. The writ is disposed subject to the petitioner depositing 25% of the disputed tax as a pre-deposit condition for de novo proceedings; bank attachment is ordered to be vacated on compliance and provided no other arrears exist. Amounts already recovered or paid will be verified and set off against the 25% pre-deposit; if recovered amounts exceed 25% no further payment is required. Noncompliance permits respondents to resume recovery as if the writ were dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.