Validity of faceless assessment procedure challenged for jurisdictional AO intervention mid-remand, resulting in quashing of assessment for procedural...
Inventory write-off and fraudulent/wrongful trading allegations in corporate insolvency led to director liability principles applied and appeal dismis...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6741 to 6760 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Court exercised discretionary relief despite expiry of limitation under Section 107 by quashing and remitting the tax order for fresh adjudication on merits. The writ is disposed subject to the petitioner depositing 25% of the disputed tax as a pre-deposit condition for de novo proceedings; bank attachment is ordered to be vacated on compliance and provided no other arrears exist. Amounts already recovered or paid will be verified and set off against the 25% pre-deposit; if recovered amounts exceed 25% no further payment is required. Noncompliance permits respondents to resume recovery as if the writ were dismissed.
Court exercised discretionary relief despite expiry of limitation under Section 107 by quashing and remitting the tax order for fresh adjudication on merits. The writ is disposed subject to the petitioner depositing 25% of the disputed tax as a pre-deposit condition for de novo proceedings; bank attachment is ordered to be vacated on compliance and provided no other arrears exist. Amounts already recovered or paid will be verified and set off against the 25% pre-deposit; if recovered amounts exceed 25% no further payment is required. Noncompliance permits respondents to resume recovery as if the writ were dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4813 
Join Channel 
