Benami transaction and beneficial ownership: documentary and circumstantial evidence show payors were true beneficiaries, resulting in PBPTA consequen...
Denial of Preferential Treatment under SAFTA overturned where unchallenged Country of Origin certificate warranted exemption under Notification benefi...
Limitation for issuance of a tax recovery order under Section 73 was considered alongside an extension by notification; because the impugned order was ex parte after the petitioner failed to reply to the show cause notice, the court remitted the matter for fresh adjudication on merits. The respondent must give notice before passing any fresh order. Proceeding will continue only if the petitioner deposits 50% of the disputed tax in cash or from its electronic cash ledger within 30 days; bank attachment will be lifted upon that deposit, and failure to comply permits recovery as if the petition were dismissed.
Limitation for issuance of a tax recovery order under Section 73 was considered alongside an extension by notification; because the impugned order was ex parte after the petitioner failed to reply to the show cause notice, the court remitted the matter for fresh adjudication on merits. The respondent must give notice before passing any fresh order. Proceeding will continue only if the petitioner deposits 50% of the disputed tax in cash or from its electronic cash ledger within 30 days; bank attachment will be lifted upon that deposit, and failure to comply permits recovery as if the petition were dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
