Retrospective application of beneficial circulars upheld, binding officers and granting post adjudication relief where adjudication occurred after cir...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Interest income on non-performing assets was treated as taxable where the taxpayer both accrued interest and made substantial fresh advances to the same borrowers; the court held that such conduct negates a claim that accrued interest was merely notional and uncollectible, and therefore supports taxation. The writ was held non-maintainable because an effective statutory appellate remedy existed and was not timely availed, so the High Court refused to substitute writ jurisdiction for the lapsed appeal. The tribunal's fact-driven distinction between loan categories based on borrower conduct and fresh advances was upheld, favouring revenue on the merits.
Interest income on non-performing assets was treated as taxable where the taxpayer both accrued interest and made substantial fresh advances to the same borrowers; the court held that such conduct negates a claim that accrued interest was merely notional and uncollectible, and therefore supports taxation. The writ was held non-maintainable because an effective statutory appellate remedy existed and was not timely availed, so the High Court refused to substitute writ jurisdiction for the lapsed appeal. The tribunal's fact-driven distinction between loan categories based on borrower conduct and fresh advances was upheld, favouring revenue on the merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.