Regulatory consolidation for investment advisers: SEBI issues master circular consolidating guidance and prescribing compliance, reporting, fees and s...
Reopening of assessment cannot rest solely on an audit party's opinion; reassessment under Section 147/148 is impermissible and power of revision shou...
Page of 4811
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6121 to 6140 of 96208 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Interest income on non-performing assets was treated as taxable where the taxpayer both accrued interest and made substantial fresh advances to the same borrowers; the court held that such conduct negates a claim that accrued interest was merely notional and uncollectible, and therefore supports taxation. The writ was held non-maintainable because an effective statutory appellate remedy existed and was not timely availed, so the High Court refused to substitute writ jurisdiction for the lapsed appeal. The tribunal's fact-driven distinction between loan categories based on borrower conduct and fresh advances was upheld, favouring revenue on the merits.
Interest income on non-performing assets was treated as taxable where the taxpayer both accrued interest and made substantial fresh advances to the same borrowers; the court held that such conduct negates a claim that accrued interest was merely notional and uncollectible, and therefore supports taxation. The writ was held non-maintainable because an effective statutory appellate remedy existed and was not timely availed, so the High Court refused to substitute writ jurisdiction for the lapsed appeal. The tribunal's fact-driven distinction between loan categories based on borrower conduct and fresh advances was upheld, favouring revenue on the merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.