Consultancy fees claimed as business expense-can tax disallowance rest on survey suspicion despite invoices, contracts and bank trail? Appeal dismisse...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7501 to 7520 of 96365 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Issuance of assessment notices and an assessment order in the name of a non-existent entity for a postamalgamation year was held to be a substantive illegality rather than a curable procedural defect under Section 292B; the assessing officer should have identified the correct taxpayer for the assessment year. The court declined the revenue's plea to cure the defect under Section 292B, relying on precedent, and set aside the assessment founded on notices issued to the ceased entity. Decision pronounced in favour of the assessee.
Issuance of assessment notices and an assessment order in the name of a non-existent entity for a postamalgamation year was held to be a substantive illegality rather than a curable procedural defect under Section 292B; the assessing officer should have identified the correct taxpayer for the assessment year. The court declined the revenue's plea to cure the defect under Section 292B, relying on precedent, and set aside the assessment founded on notices issued to the ceased entity. Decision pronounced in favour of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.