Business reorganisation requires recognition of successor's modified return; draft orders against dissolved transferor quashed and fresh review direct...
Pre-commencement R&D deduction denied where business had not commenced; deeming benefit requires tangible start of manufacture or commercial exploitat...
Priority of set-off: brought forward business losses must be adjusted before unabsorbed depreciation; procedural safeguards required for invoking rest...
Issuance of assessment notices and an assessment order in the name of a non-existent entity for a postamalgamation year was held to be a substantive illegality rather than a curable procedural defect under Section 292B; the assessing officer should have identified the correct taxpayer for the assessment year. The court declined the revenue's plea to cure the defect under Section 292B, relying on precedent, and set aside the assessment founded on notices issued to the ceased entity. Decision pronounced in favour of the assessee.
Issuance of assessment notices and an assessment order in the name of a non-existent entity for a postamalgamation year was held to be a substantive illegality rather than a curable procedural defect under Section 292B; the assessing officer should have identified the correct taxpayer for the assessment year. The court declined the revenue's plea to cure the defect under Section 292B, relying on precedent, and set aside the assessment founded on notices issued to the ceased entity. Decision pronounced in favour of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.