Insolvency petition based on admitted debt and default upheld; challenge for malicious initiation rejected, settlement may proceed under resolution fr...
Quashing of FIR and challenge to ECIR over alleged diversion of funds and preferential ESOP pricing dismissed after prima facie money-laundering findi...
Determination turns on whether electronic debit or challan generation marks the payment date for advance tax. The tribunal found that an electronic netbanking debit reflected in the taxpayer's bank statement on the statutory due date constitutes payment; delay in generation/credit of the challan due to bank/technical processes is beyond the taxpayer's control. The presumption that payment was timely stands unless Revenue proves otherwise. Consequently, interest under advancetax delay provisions was not leviable and the relief was granted to the taxpayer.
Determination turns on whether electronic debit or challan generation marks the payment date for advance tax. The tribunal found that an electronic netbanking debit reflected in the taxpayer's bank statement on the statutory due date constitutes payment; delay in generation/credit of the challan due to bank/technical processes is beyond the taxpayer's control. The presumption that payment was timely stands unless Revenue proves otherwise. Consequently, interest under advancetax delay provisions was not leviable and the relief was granted to the taxpayer.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.