Genuineness of investment evidence determines LTCG entitlement; non specific regulatory reports cannot displace transaction specific documentary proof...
Page of 4816
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5881 to 5900 of 96301 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Undisclosed foreign investments in Dubai and Singapore were held unsubstantiated because the assessee failed to produce confirmations or reliable proof of the named lenders and source of funds; therefore the CIT(A)'s acceptance of disclosure was reversed. The tribunal reasoned that book entries alone did not establish the nature or origin of the investments and directed the assessing officer to require confirmations from the two foreign entities and satisfy himself on source and nature of funds. The tribunal also held that compounding of foreign exchange offences does not relieve the assessee from incometax or Black Money Act consequences, and remanded the matter for fresh inquiry.
Undisclosed foreign investments in Dubai and Singapore were held unsubstantiated because the assessee failed to produce confirmations or reliable proof of the named lenders and source of funds; therefore the CIT(A)'s acceptance of disclosure was reversed. The tribunal reasoned that book entries alone did not establish the nature or origin of the investments and directed the assessing officer to require confirmations from the two foreign entities and satisfy himself on source and nature of funds. The tribunal also held that compounding of foreign exchange offences does not relieve the assessee from incometax or Black Money Act consequences, and remanded the matter for fresh inquiry.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
