Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Insurer's investment gains and investment write-downs face Section 263 revision; enquiry upheld, Rule 5(b)(ii) lapse sustained, late corrigendum quash...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7241 to 7260 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Customs valuation under the Customs Act is distinct from DGFT...
Customs valuation and import permissibility conflict resolved: accepted enhancement of transaction value removes liability for confiscation and penalties
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Customs valuation under the Customs Act is distinct from DGFT value-based importability restrictions; the declared transaction value must be assessed under the Valuation Rules for ad valorem duty, while DGFT minimum import price regulates permissibility. The Tribunal noted that the adjudicating authority enhanced declared value without applying Valuation Rules, aligning it solely with policy conditions; once that enhanced value (USD 60) is accepted by the importer, the goods become compliant with the DGFT notification and liable neither to confiscation nor redemption penalties. The Tribunal emphasised that factual disclosure is essential because tribunals accept parties' submissions at face value.
Customs valuation under the Customs Act is distinct from DGFT value-based importability restrictions; the declared transaction value must be assessed under the Valuation Rules for ad valorem duty, while DGFT minimum import price regulates permissibility. The Tribunal noted that the adjudicating authority enhanced declared value without applying Valuation Rules, aligning it solely with policy conditions; once that enhanced value (USD 60) is accepted by the importer, the goods become compliant with the DGFT notification and liable neither to confiscation nor redemption penalties. The Tribunal emphasised that factual disclosure is essential because tribunals accept parties' submissions at face value.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.