Attachment and proclamation of sale of immovable property: limitation treated from financial year end; proclamation held within period, petition dismi...
Second Schedule attachment and validity of a post-notice mortgage: TRO cannot declare mortgage void ab initio; sale and appropriation allowed thereaft...
Limitation for final assessment under sections 144C and 153 treated jointly, resulting in quashing of timebarred assessment order and liberty to reviv...
Deductibility of settlement payments for securities law penalties and treatment of unexplained cash credits in share trading -- Tribunal upholds posit...
Threshold for allottee-initiated insolvency petitions in leasehold real estate upheld; petition admitted after possession letters deemed legally ineff...
Contravention of foreign exchange rules in crossborder diamond payments; appellate tribunal reduces one appellant's penalty for delay and proportional...
Customs valuation under the Customs Act is distinct from DGFT...
Customs valuation and import permissibility conflict resolved: accepted enhancement of transaction value removes liability for confiscation and penalties
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Customs valuation under the Customs Act is distinct from DGFT value-based importability restrictions; the declared transaction value must be assessed under the Valuation Rules for ad valorem duty, while DGFT minimum import price regulates permissibility. The Tribunal noted that the adjudicating authority enhanced declared value without applying Valuation Rules, aligning it solely with policy conditions; once that enhanced value (USD 60) is accepted by the importer, the goods become compliant with the DGFT notification and liable neither to confiscation nor redemption penalties. The Tribunal emphasised that factual disclosure is essential because tribunals accept parties' submissions at face value.
Customs valuation under the Customs Act is distinct from DGFT value-based importability restrictions; the declared transaction value must be assessed under the Valuation Rules for ad valorem duty, while DGFT minimum import price regulates permissibility. The Tribunal noted that the adjudicating authority enhanced declared value without applying Valuation Rules, aligning it solely with policy conditions; once that enhanced value (USD 60) is accepted by the importer, the goods become compliant with the DGFT notification and liable neither to confiscation nor redemption penalties. The Tribunal emphasised that factual disclosure is essential because tribunals accept parties' submissions at face value.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.