Reversal of input tax credit in proportion to exempt supply: specificity of show-cause notice required; order set aside, fresh proceedings allowed wit...
Benami transaction and beneficial ownership: documentary and circumstantial evidence show payors were true beneficiaries, resulting in PBPTA consequen...
Invocation of a corporate guarantee on 12.02.2020 triggered a fresh cause of action, starting the threeyear limitation period, and balance sheet entries in 202122 and 202324 constituted acknowledgements under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, thereby extending limitation and rendering the petition filed on 14.04.2025 timely. The insolvency petition's Form1 contained pleaded particulars of debt and date of default; the Adjudicating Authority correctly treated the application as complete and admitted it. Realisations recorded in liquidation and a related corporate guarantor's resolution process were public and did not amount to suppression. The appellate tribunal dismissed the challenge to admission.
Invocation of a corporate guarantee on 12.02.2020 triggered a fresh cause of action, starting the threeyear limitation period, and balance sheet entries in 202122 and 202324 constituted acknowledgements under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, thereby extending limitation and rendering the petition filed on 14.04.2025 timely. The insolvency petition's Form1 contained pleaded particulars of debt and date of default; the Adjudicating Authority correctly treated the application as complete and admitted it. Realisations recorded in liquidation and a related corporate guarantor's resolution process were public and did not amount to suppression. The appellate tribunal dismissed the challenge to admission.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.