Concessional Basic Customs Duty on Ethernet switches: classification as enterprise switches upheld, challenge dismissed for lack of substantial law qu...
Insolvency petition based on admitted debt and default upheld; challenge for malicious initiation rejected, settlement may proceed under resolution fr...
Quashing of FIR and challenge to ECIR over alleged diversion of funds and preferential ESOP pricing dismissed after prima facie money-laundering findi...
Invocation of a corporate guarantee on 12.02.2020 triggered a fresh cause of action, starting the threeyear limitation period, and balance sheet entries in 202122 and 202324 constituted acknowledgements under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, thereby extending limitation and rendering the petition filed on 14.04.2025 timely. The insolvency petition's Form1 contained pleaded particulars of debt and date of default; the Adjudicating Authority correctly treated the application as complete and admitted it. Realisations recorded in liquidation and a related corporate guarantor's resolution process were public and did not amount to suppression. The appellate tribunal dismissed the challenge to admission.
Invocation of a corporate guarantee on 12.02.2020 triggered a fresh cause of action, starting the threeyear limitation period, and balance sheet entries in 202122 and 202324 constituted acknowledgements under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, thereby extending limitation and rendering the petition filed on 14.04.2025 timely. The insolvency petition's Form1 contained pleaded particulars of debt and date of default; the Adjudicating Authority correctly treated the application as complete and admitted it. Realisations recorded in liquidation and a related corporate guarantor's resolution process were public and did not amount to suppression. The appellate tribunal dismissed the challenge to admission.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
