Regulatory consolidation for investment advisers: SEBI issues master circular consolidating guidance and prescribing compliance, reporting, fees and s...
Reopening of assessment cannot rest solely on an audit party's opinion; reassessment under Section 147/148 is impermissible and power of revision shou...
Page of 4811
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6121 to 6140 of 96208 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Invocation of a corporate guarantee on 12.02.2020 triggered a fresh cause of action, starting the threeyear limitation period, and balance sheet entries in 202122 and 202324 constituted acknowledgements under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, thereby extending limitation and rendering the petition filed on 14.04.2025 timely. The insolvency petition's Form1 contained pleaded particulars of debt and date of default; the Adjudicating Authority correctly treated the application as complete and admitted it. Realisations recorded in liquidation and a related corporate guarantor's resolution process were public and did not amount to suppression. The appellate tribunal dismissed the challenge to admission.
Invocation of a corporate guarantee on 12.02.2020 triggered a fresh cause of action, starting the threeyear limitation period, and balance sheet entries in 202122 and 202324 constituted acknowledgements under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, thereby extending limitation and rendering the petition filed on 14.04.2025 timely. The insolvency petition's Form1 contained pleaded particulars of debt and date of default; the Adjudicating Authority correctly treated the application as complete and admitted it. Realisations recorded in liquidation and a related corporate guarantor's resolution process were public and did not amount to suppression. The appellate tribunal dismissed the challenge to admission.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
