Benami transaction and beneficial ownership: documentary and circumstantial evidence show payors were true beneficiaries, resulting in PBPTA consequen...
Denial of Preferential Treatment under SAFTA overturned where unchallenged Country of Origin certificate warranted exemption under Notification benefi...
The Tribunal held that homebuyers as a class of creditors met the quantitative threshold for initiating a Section 7 application because the corporate debtor's developed-share entitlement produced sufficient allotted units; therefore the Section 7 petition should not have been dismissed on threshold grounds. The Tribunal treated the development agreement allocation (18% share) and actual units sold by the corporate debtor as relevant to eligibility at filing, and concluded the threshold is assessed at filing rather than later-consequence: remand to the Adjudicating Authority. The Tribunal also noted maintainability of proceedings against related landowner/developer parties forming the same project and recorded ex parte conduct by the corporate debtor, without deciding merits.
The Tribunal held that homebuyers as a class of creditors met the quantitative threshold for initiating a Section 7 application because the corporate debtor's developed-share entitlement produced sufficient allotted units; therefore the Section 7 petition should not have been dismissed on threshold grounds. The Tribunal treated the development agreement allocation (18% share) and actual units sold by the corporate debtor as relevant to eligibility at filing, and concluded the threshold is assessed at filing rather than later-consequence: remand to the Adjudicating Authority. The Tribunal also noted maintainability of proceedings against related landowner/developer parties forming the same project and recorded ex parte conduct by the corporate debtor, without deciding merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
