Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Cancellation of GST registration was upheld where registration was obtained to wrongfully avail input tax credit without proof of physical movement and genuineness; court found transactions were camouflaged by mantenering multiple registrations at the same premises, and that invoices were used to pass illegitimate ITC. The appellate order affirming cancellation was not interfered with for lack of justification in holding separate registrations for the same premises; consequence: the writ petition dismissed and respondents granted liberty to recover tax and penalty from customers.
Cancellation of GST registration was upheld where registration was obtained to wrongfully avail input tax credit without proof of physical movement and genuineness; court found transactions were camouflaged by mantenering multiple registrations at the same premises, and that invoices were used to pass illegitimate ITC. The appellate order affirming cancellation was not interfered with for lack of justification in holding separate registrations for the same premises; consequence: the writ petition dismissed and respondents granted liberty to recover tax and penalty from customers.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.