Search and seizure: abatement of earlier search bars use of prior seized material in later search-based assessments; relief limited to new documents f...
Admission of additional evidence under remand rules must await a meaningful remand report; failure to do so breaches natural justice and mandates rema...
Export Obligation Discharge Certificates for EPCG compliance cannot be questioned by Customs unless DGFT adjudicates and cancels them, so demands quas...
Page of 4811
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6561 to 6580 of 96208 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
An attachment and proclamation of sale under the tax recovery...
Attachment and proclamation of sale of immovable property: limitation treated from financial year end; proclamation held within period, petition dismissed
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
An attachment and proclamation of sale under the tax recovery scheme was challenged as barred by the threeyear limitation in Rule 68B. The court held that where a party bypasses seeking a certificate of appeal and files a special leave petition, the assessment did not attain finality until the Supreme Court dismissed the SLP, so limitation is reckoned from the end of that financial year; the challenged proclamation (12.06.2018) fell within the Limitation period and is valid. Failure to sell within the period triggers a statutory vacation of the attachment, but Part III does not extinguish other rights to recover dues; a subsequent limited certificate claim did not prevail. Writ petition dismissed.
An attachment and proclamation of sale under the tax recovery scheme was challenged as barred by the threeyear limitation in Rule 68B. The court held that where a party bypasses seeking a certificate of appeal and files a special leave petition, the assessment did not attain finality until the Supreme Court dismissed the SLP, so limitation is reckoned from the end of that financial year; the challenged proclamation (12.06.2018) fell within the Limitation period and is valid. Failure to sell within the period triggers a statutory vacation of the attachment, but Part III does not extinguish other rights to recover dues; a subsequent limited certificate claim did not prevail. Writ petition dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
