Attachment and proclamation of sale of immovable property: limitation treated from financial year end; proclamation held within period, petition dismi...
Second Schedule attachment and validity of a post-notice mortgage: TRO cannot declare mortgage void ab initio; sale and appropriation allowed thereaft...
Limitation for final assessment under sections 144C and 153 treated jointly, resulting in quashing of timebarred assessment order and liberty to reviv...
Deductibility of settlement payments for securities law penalties and treatment of unexplained cash credits in share trading -- Tribunal upholds posit...
Threshold for allottee-initiated insolvency petitions in leasehold real estate upheld; petition admitted after possession letters deemed legally ineff...
Contravention of foreign exchange rules in crossborder diamond payments; appellate tribunal reduces one appellant's penalty for delay and proportional...
An attachment and proclamation of sale under the tax recovery...
Attachment and proclamation of sale of immovable property: limitation treated from financial year end; proclamation held within period, petition dismissed
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
An attachment and proclamation of sale under the tax recovery scheme was challenged as barred by the threeyear limitation in Rule 68B. The court held that where a party bypasses seeking a certificate of appeal and files a special leave petition, the assessment did not attain finality until the Supreme Court dismissed the SLP, so limitation is reckoned from the end of that financial year; the challenged proclamation (12.06.2018) fell within the Limitation period and is valid. Failure to sell within the period triggers a statutory vacation of the attachment, but Part III does not extinguish other rights to recover dues; a subsequent limited certificate claim did not prevail. Writ petition dismissed.
An attachment and proclamation of sale under the tax recovery scheme was challenged as barred by the threeyear limitation in Rule 68B. The court held that where a party bypasses seeking a certificate of appeal and files a special leave petition, the assessment did not attain finality until the Supreme Court dismissed the SLP, so limitation is reckoned from the end of that financial year; the challenged proclamation (12.06.2018) fell within the Limitation period and is valid. Failure to sell within the period triggers a statutory vacation of the attachment, but Part III does not extinguish other rights to recover dues; a subsequent limited certificate claim did not prevail. Writ petition dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
